- DOCKER MAC OS X NO SUCH HOST INSTALL
- DOCKER MAC OS X NO SUCH HOST CODE
- DOCKER MAC OS X NO SUCH HOST PLUS
- DOCKER MAC OS X NO SUCH HOST WINDOWS
It gives more flexibilityĭefault sharing in Vagrant VirtualBox provisioning is very slow
DOCKER MAC OS X NO SUCH HOST INSTALL
I started to use Vagrant to work with VirtualBox and install Docker in it. I also switched to GPT and UEFI and have an option to boot directly into Arch Linux in case I want to circumvent the overhead of the virtualized hardware, giving me the best of both worlds with little compromise.
DOCKER MAC OS X NO SUCH HOST WINDOWS
I personally use a Windows host and have a 64 GB partition on my SSD that I mount directly into my Arch Linux guest and operate from there. If you do have Windows users, then, short of buying them an enterprise license, it would be best to simply ask them to repartition their disks and work inside a guest VM. Create a Vagrant machine and configure NFS shares between your host and guest and profit. If your developer audience is wholly compromised of Linux and OS X users, option 1 might be viable. revert to mounting raw disk partitions into the guest, noting the related risks of giving your hypervisor raw disk access.Unfortunately, for Windows users, the only way to get NFS service support is to run the enterprise edition of Windows (which I believe will still be true for Windows 10). drop vboxfs in favor of a shared transport mechanism that results in better I/O in the guest, such as the Network File System.The best way to approach the situation is to either: Unfortunately, this is not applicable to managing Git repositories, short of splatting/truncating your history and committing to data loss, unless the Git repository itself is provisioned within the guest, which forces you to have two repositories: one to clone the environment for inflating the guest and another containing the actual sources, where consolidating the two worlds becomes an absolute pain. This alone improved the startup time from ~28 seconds down to ~4 seconds for a Node.js application with a few dozen dependencies running on my SSD. Mkdir /var/cache/node_modules & ln -s /var/cache/node_modules /myproject/node_modules For instance, symlinking the package manager directory into the project's vboxfs tree, with something like: The obvious approach is to move as much of the project-related files outside of vboxfs somewhere else into the guest. There are numerous situations by which developing the project sources inside the guest VM are brought to a crawl, the main two being scores of 3rd party sources introduce by package managers and Git repositories with a sizable history.
The main culprit is VirtualBox's vboxfs which is used for file sharing which, despite being incredibly useful, results in poor filesystem I/O. This is unfortunately a typical problem Windows and OS X users are currently struggling with that cannot be solved trivially, especially in the case of Windows users. Vagrant$ docker run -it -rm -v $(pwd)/work:/work ubuntu:12.04 find /work Having that: host$ vagrant up & vagrant ssh #NB: this folder mapping will not have the boot2docker issue of slow syncĬonfig.vm.synced_folder "~/work", "/home/vagrant/work" #by default we'll claim ports 9080-9090 on the host systemĬonfig.vm.network :forwarded_port, guest: i, host: i
DOCKER MAC OS X NO SUCH HOST PLUS
On the plus side, when I want to clean unused docker garbage (images, volumes, etc.) I simply destroy the vagrant vm and re-create it again :)Įlaboration nfigure(VAGRANTFILE_API_VERSION) do |config| On the downside, I have to pre-map folders to vagrant (basically my whole work directory) and pre-expose a range of ports from the vagrant box to the host to have access to the docker services directly from there. No such big penalty for mounting folders host->vagrant->docker.
The workaround I use is not to use boot2docker but instead have a vagrant VM provisioned with docker. The bottle neck is sharing between host and VM. However, sharing between VM and Docker isn't a problem. I used Docker file sharing feature (meaning I run) docker run -P -i -v : -t /bin/bash However, I can't seem to find any information on this subject. I heard about some workaround to make it fast.
DOCKER MAC OS X NO SUCH HOST CODE
If I move source code in the docker, I will have the same problem in IDE (it will have to access shared files and it will be slow). This way you can use your IDE to edit it and use docker just to build it.Ī) Docker on OS X uses VM (VirtualBox VM)ī) File sharing is reasonably slow (way slower than file IO on host)Ĭ) The project has something like a gazzilion files (which exaggerate problems #a an #b). The source code for this project lives outside of docker container (on the host). I created the whole dev environment in docker and can build a project in it.
I am playing around with different tools to prepare dev environment.
0 kommentar(er)
